BBC Hinting At A Freely Box Which Could End Freeview Era

This post may contain affiliate links*

The streaming box cord-cutters have been begging for since Freely launched last year might finally be on the horizon.

In a speech at Salford’s Lowry Theatre today, BBC Director-General Tim Davie revealed the broadcaster is considering a dedicated Freely streaming device with a simplified interface – directly tackling the platform’s biggest limitation.

While frustratingly light on details, this marks the first semi-confirmation that a standalone Freely box could be in the works. No more needing to buy a brand new TV just to access the platform – if this is actually released.

The Missing Piece of the Freely Puzzle

Since its launch in April 2024, Freely has been positioned as the streaming-age successor to Freeview and Freesat – a unified platform that lets you access live TV channels and on-demand content without needing an aerial poking out of your roof.

Freely TV guide
Freely

Over the past year, Freely has gradually got its act together, feature-wise.

Just this month, as we reported, the platform received the “Freely Next” update, adding long-awaited features like a Backwards TV Guide and a “Never Miss” function that highlights what’s on now and what you’ve just missed.

The platform now offers more than 55 streaming channels from the usual suspects (BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, UKTV), with some TVs (like Hisense and Toshiba) offering 80+ additional FAST channels from the VIDAA platform.

On the hardware front, Freely has made decent progress, recently adding Philips TVs and JVC models to its lineup.

According to their latest boasting, Freely has now secured deals with brands representing nearly half (48.6%) of the UK TV market – not bad for a platform that’s barely a year old, though major brands – such as Samsung and LG – are still missing.

But for all this progress, Freely has suffered from one massive, glaring problem: you can only get it if you shell out for a new TV.

There’s been no standalone box or streaming stick that would allow the millions of us with perfectly good older TVs to access the platform without forking out hundreds of quid for a new telly.

This has been the elephant in the room since day one, and a question I’ve badgered Freely representatives about on multiple occasions.

While they’ve never ruled out standalone devices entirely, there’s been no concrete movement – until now (maybe).

The Digital TV Transition – It’s Coming, Whether We Like It Or Not

In today’s speech, Davie made it clear that the BBC is fully embracing the shift to internet-based television:

“We have been working hard to build digital platforms and content to meet changing audience needs, enriching our offer and welcoming the possibilities of a post broadcast world,” he said.

Going further, Davie called for the government to “confirm an IP switchover in the 2030s, setting out the conditions and providing certainty to ensure success.”

Tim Davie BBC director general
Tim Davie, BBC Director General (Photo: BBC)

This echoes the government research we’ve banged on about before, which predicts that by 2040, more than 70% of UK homes will have ditched aerials and dishes entirely, getting all their telly through their broadband instead.

The BBC is clearly positioning itself as a leader in this transition, rather than being dragged kicking and screaming into the streaming age.

As Davie put it: “I talked a few years ago about my belief that we needed to own digital switchover, not get dragged, and proactively shape the future.”

For the 18 million UK homes still using Freeview, this confirms what many have suspected – the aerial on your roof has a shelf life.

Ultra thin indoor aerial in hand

Davie’s comments suggest the BBC has fully embraced the inevitable death of traditional broadcasting, and is now planning for life after.

The Freely Device Revealed?

So what exactly did Davie say about this potential Freely device? Here’s the key quote from his speech:

“We want to double down on Freely as a universal free service to deliver live TV over broadband.

“And we are considering a streaming media device with Freely capabilities built in, with a radically simplified user interface specifically designed to help those yet to benefit from IP services.”

While this doesn’t give us much in terms of specs, price, or release date, it does give us a clear picture of what the BBC is aiming for – a simple, accessible device that works more like traditional TV than a complicated streaming stick.

Why a Freely Device Matters

You might be thinking, “So what? We’ve already got Fire TV, Roku, and a dozen other streaming gadgets. Who needs another box?”

The answer is simpler than you might think: millions of people who find current streamers too complicated.

Fire TV and other mainstream streaming platforms are brilliant for tech-savvy viewers who want apps, games, and all the bells and whistles.

Amazon Fire TV HD Screen

As we saw with Amazon’s recent addition of BBC channels to their Live tab, these platforms are making strides toward offering a Freely-like experience, but they’re still primarily app-focused ecosystems with all the complexity that entails.

The Freely device Davie hinted at would be something different – a “radically simplified user interface specifically designed to help those yet to benefit from IP services.”

In plain English? A box that works more like traditional telly. Turn it on, see live (streaming) channels, access a simple guide, and watch catch-up without navigating a maze of apps or being pestered with endless recommendations and adverts.

This could be a godsend for older viewers, tech-phobic relatives, or anyone who just wants their telly to behave like, well, a telly – not a computer with a Netflix addiction.

The Prominence Problem

Elsewhere in his speech, Davie highlighted another issue that might be pushing the BBC / Freely towards developing its own hardware – the ongoing battle for visibility on existing streaming platforms.

Freely on a TV

Reading between the lines, it’s clear the BBC is growing frustrated with how its services are positioned on platforms like Fire TV and Roku, where commercial interests determine which apps get prime placement.

“We need to see robust implementation of the Media Act at pace,” Davie urged, emphasising the importance of “securing good PSB prominence on every platform.”

His concern? That without intervention, finding public service content will become increasingly difficult as commercial interests take priority.

“If people can’t find our services, and prominence is simply secured by the highest bidder, then we can’t build connections and trust,” he warned.

A dedicated Freely device would solve this problem at a stroke – allowing the BBC and other public service broadcasters to control exactly how their content is presented, without having to negotiate with (or pay) tech giants for visibility.

The Challenge: Not Leaving Grandma Behind

One of the biggest hurdles in the digital TV transition is making sure everyone can still watch their channels and shows, regardless of their tech skills or budget.

The government’s own research has identified around 1.5 million households (about 5% of UK homes) that could be left in the dark when the aerial signal eventually gets switched off.

Those most at risk? Older people (particularly over-75s), people living alone, those on tight budgets, rural communities with rubbish broadband, and people with disabilities.

A dedicated Freely device could help solve this problem, providing a simple, affordable bridge to digital TV for these vulnerable groups.

Davie acknowledged this challenge directly, saying the BBC can “play a key role in innovating to ensure that the new world is inclusive and accessible,” with a Freely device being part of that solution.

But there are still loads of questions the BBC hasn’t answered.

Will this box need fast broadband? How much will it cost? Will there be subsidies for pensioners? And most importantly – when on earth might we actually see one in the shops?

Can a Freely Box Stand Up to Fire TV and Roku?

Let’s be honest – if and when a Freely device does turn up, it won’t be trying to compete head-on with Fire TV, Roku, and the rest of the streaming gang. They’re playing different games.

Streaming sticks comparison 2025 side

While those platforms are battling it out in the app-driven streaming wars, a Freely box would be focused on providing a simple, straightforward TV experience for people who find modern streaming devices a bit of a faff.

Think of it more as a spiritual successor to those basic Freeview boxes that helped millions navigate the digital switchover back in the 2000s – a helping hand for those who might otherwise be left behind when the aerial signals eventually go dark.

That said, there’s potentially a bigger market for such a device than the BBC might think. Plenty of us are suffering from “smart TV fatigue” – fed up with navigating complex interfaces, juggling dozens of apps, and being bombarded with recommendations and adverts every time we just want to watch Eastenders.

A streamlined, no-nonsense Freely box that just shows you what’s on now, what’s coming up, and what you’ve missed could be a breath of fresh air for viewers who want their telly to be simple again.

But before you jump – no, a simple Freely box would, most likely, NOT include any recording capabilities (such as those on Freeview recorders like the Manhattan T4-R), even though many of our readers still swear by old-style recording.

What’s Next for Freely?

While Davie’s announcement gives us hope, it’s worth noting that he only said they’re “considering” such a device – not that one is definitely coming or has a release date.

That said, the logic for such a device is blindingly obvious, and with the digital switchover now firmly on the horizon, the case for a universally accessible Freely box is stronger than ever.

If a Freely device does materialise, it could be the final piece of the puzzle that transforms Freely from a nice bonus feature on pricey new TVs to a genuine successor to Freeview – accessible to everyone, whether you’ve bought a new telly recently or not.

However, this doesn’t say anything about potentially adding Freely support to existing Fire TV and Roku streaming sticks – we still don’t know whether that day will ever come.

We reached out to Freely for more information about this potential new box, and will update this article accordingly – but I suspect Davie’s quote is the most we’ll get in the near future.

Want to stay updated on the latest Freely and TV news? Don’t forget to Subscribe to our free newsletter.

6 thoughts on “BBC Hinting At A Freely Box Which Could End Freeview Era”

  1. As a cord cutter, the whole point is to cut the cord snd watch cheaper.

    Yet, we are looking to be strong armed into connecting up a cord to watch what used to be free?

    Come again?

    Who thinks that pushing distribution costs onto the consumer, who now must fork out up to a hundred quid a month for broadband, to watch free tv that thus isn’t free by any traditional definition, was a good idea?

    So, you pay for the TV licence (or whatever replaces it) plus a hundred a month on top to support a few corded TVs (wifi ends in the broadband cord remember) to watch TV that is “free” simply because they dont charge you a third time with a subscription on top?

    What is this?

    Why are we not migrating to 5G Broadcast like every other country? Free 5G data streaming on all devices from TVs to smartphones. No SIM, no contract, and crucially… works in a caravan.

    Some people like holidaying in the UK, in tents and caravans. Places where there is zero broadband. And frequently mobile data bandwidth that makes ISDN look fast.

    Take Caister. I’m there in a week and know that mobile data rates in the caravan top out at a blistering 300kb/s! Wooooo!

    Just about fast enough to watch a YouTube video at 360p. Amazing.

    But thats not all, once everyone in the site wakes up it plummets to 50-60kb/s. Not fast enough to have a voice call on WhatsApp.

    At that point I tend to watch a DVD, or the TV… as that solves the issue.

    5G broadcast will not need anything more than a 5G broadcast mast. No bandwidth issues, no cords, no ISP. Works in a tent in Glastonbury.

    In 10 years nobody is watching TV in tents in Glastonbury to see if they can see themselves. Tents dont have broadband, Glastonbury mobile bandwidth will still only let you send a voice note.

    Why is this supposed to be better?

    Cut the cord? Broadband is the cord!

    I’m not interested in paying twice for what was free. Ridiculous idea. Peddled as a way to have them save money by having us pay for distribution.

    Unless households get free broadband as standard for freely plus essential services like council/nhs/government/job seeking/education then I’ll have nothing to for with it.

    I’m recording EVERYTHING I can over the next ten years as thats all I’ll watch out of principal till freely is actually free.

    Reply
    • £100 a month? Most people pay less than £30.
      5G broadcast? Plain old 5G will do surely? Why overcomplicate it?
      And once BT has finished PSTN switch off, everyone with a phone will basically have broadband already anyway…..

      Reply
      • 5G Broadcast is a more efficient use of the airwaves, and so it’s better for broadcasting radio and television.

        Which makes it inevitable, and coming soon.

        Reply
      • £100 a month for 200 megabit.

        Thats what loyalty gets you, and when you are in an area where only VM can give anything that is above 10Mb well, you can see the issue.

        People will only get your kind of prices if they complain and switch and talk to retentions. But most people don’t do that. Only the savvy few like you bother. It’s a great game in the end.

        Client server architecture for TV is ridiculous. My TV has no business talking to a server. Broadcasting solves that issue, amd the much of the world is upgrading to 5G broadcast.

        Only the blind idiots in the UK government are using a crazy idea of high bandwidth cables to houses as a valid solution. If you somehow manage to get actual optical fibre to every property in the UK (which as we know is nigh on impossible but lets assume you can) then you could just about manage it. Consider those cables have to have a lifetime of at least 50 years, with the ability to handle the undoubtedly increasing bandwidth desires of future internet addicted generations.

        But with radio, you have no such problem. You have an unlimited ability to serve an unlimited number of endpoints. You pay to license the spectrum, maintain the antenna and the power needed for it’s range.

        Cheap as chips. You have 200,000 viewers? Same as serving to 800,000. No additional costs.

        However with internet delivery, not even limited to inefficient client server models but multicast as well, you have a massive financial burden.

        You have to upgrade your capabilities every year or less to serve the streams to the extra hundres of thousands that keep flocking to your service.

        Not just increased bandwidth, but whole new datacentres, huge energy hungry datacentres, pumping out heat, creating a mountain of constant ewaste.

        I work in IT mate. Have a degree in computer science. I can’t imagine the hell ISPs go though to support this mania.

        They will make us pay for it instead of the BBC etc. This is a ploy to have them save money, by getting us to pay twice for the privilege of watching so called “Free TV”.

        I have family who in many instances had no internet for months as it was unaffordable. Topping up the electric meter was more important. So no internet. My cousin had only her pay as you go mobile which I topped up monthly. 80GB of data, just over a dual layer blurays worth, for £25. All that data gone within a week or so, simply because she wanted to watch eastenders.

        Imagine her joy when she found a TV aerial for the Freeview TV!

        My other cousin is in her mid 20’s and wants me to find her a dvd player. Why? Well, her TV signal is terrible in that flat so she relies on her streaming stick to entertain and educate her little one. But, in many instances the little one cant watch Moana again as the subscription hasn’t been paid because: food and clothing and heating.

        The kid has Moana on dvd. Mum wants a dvd player because streaming subscriptions are the first to get cancelled.

        Her sister has two kids. And they are in the same boat with wifi and streaming sometimes being cancelled for a month due to other costs.

        They have the TV plugged into the flats aerial.

        All of that will be gone and people in similar situations in 10 years will have nothing. Completely against the original ideas of radio and the bbc charter. All to savd some fat cats money to provide a free tv service that costs the consumer premium rates.

        How is this doublethink eluding people??

        As for 5G Broadcast, which is the way forward for broadcast TV and is being implemented by multiple countries to serve Public Broadcast TV, it’s FREE!

        5G data is useless here as it’s got no coverage and failed to meet people’s expectations, and crucially like with a landline, it’s not FREE. Not to mention that in 10 years time it will be mothballed as a poor performing 4G replacement that everyone hates.

        5G Broadcast however is NOT 5G data. It is a digital broadcasting system in the 5G family. It has zero data caps, no SIMs, no costs to access. You literally can use it in a caravan just like TV today (which you can’t do with streaming).

        5G broadcast TVs will switch on and recieve TV with no need for contracts, accounts, subscriptions. And it can be built into mobile phones too!

        It saves energy, reduces costs and has no bandwidth issues as you serve thousands from just ONE signal.

        And that brings up another point. How many TVs do you have in your house?

        How many do you think most have?

        Do you think households will be happy going back to just one? Because without all that extra bandwidth for each TV, most households will have enough bandwidth for just one device. Perhaps two.

        And if you are on a social broadband tariff, yep. One TV. So, yet again needless waste. Landfills full of outdated TVs.

        And 20 years later, perhaps 15 actually: they will have you all do it again as Freely is retired.

        Next week im in Norfolk. In a caravan.

        I know the total mobile bandwidth I’ll get wont get above 300 kilobits a second. Before 8am… after that everyone else wakes up and you’ll expect 60-80kb/s.

        Yeah. I’ll be switching on the freeview tv after that point. If you want to talk about streaming as a replacement, wake me up when they finally get mobile data rates out of the joke book.

        Reply
  2. Id much rather an app for existing devices and frankly there’s no need for a ‘box’, nearly every household has some sort of extra device like a Roku, Fire Stick, Chromecast, Apple TV ect, alongside the apps we have on our existing TV’s, rendering another ‘Box’ completely pointless!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Firstbuddha Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

man watchin streaming tv on tablet

Get Cord Buster's Free UK TV Streaming Cheatsheet

FREE

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get TV And Tech News

Get Bonus Streaming TV Guide