The way we watch TV in the UK is facing its biggest shake-up since we all binned our old analogue sets for digital ones.
During a parliamentary grilling last week, BBC bosses revealed their plans for a major shift to internet-based television that will transform Freeview as we know it, while making it crystal clear they won’t be the ones coughing up for the nationwide conversion costs.
BBC bigwigs Tim Davie (Director General) and Dr Samir Shah (Chair) faced MPs at the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on March 4, giving us a peek at how Auntie plans to handle this massive tech transition over the next decade – and what it means for your viewing habits and the future of free-to-air TV in the UK.
Farewell to the Aerial?
If you’re reading this, chances are you’ve got a TV with either an aerial poking out of your roof or a satellite dish stuck to your wall – alongside any streaming devices and services.
But as we reported back in November, the government’s own research predicts that by 2040, more than 70% of UK homes will have ditched traditional broadcast methods entirely, getting all their television through their broadband connection instead.
This major shift to IPTV (Internet Protocol Television – just a fancy way of saying “TV through the internet”) will affect not just the BBC but the entire Freeview platform and how millions of us watch television.
During the committee session, Tim Davie made the BBC’s stance abundantly clear: they’re on board with this direction of travel, but with one important condition – nobody gets left behind.
“We are a universal broadcaster,” Davie told MPs, emphasising that while the BBC wants to embrace internet TV, they won’t abandon viewers who might struggle with the transition.
The Working Group Tackling TV’s Future
This parliamentary session comes just months after the government launched a dedicated working group led by Media Minister Stephanie Peacock MP to examine the future of traditional TV broadcasting in the UK.
As we covered in November, this group was formed after alarming findings showed that while most of us will be watching TV via the internet by 2040, around 1.5 million households could find themselves cut off from the digital TV revolution.
The research, conducted by the University of Exeter, painted a detailed picture of how our viewing habits are changing:
- Homes relying solely on internet streaming have almost tripled in just five years
- By 2040, 95% of UK households will be able to watch TV over the internet
- 71% will rely exclusively on broadband delivery for their television
- 24% will be “hybrid homes” using both internet and traditional broadcast
- But 5% (around 1.5 million households) will still rely entirely on traditional broadcast TV.
Those most likely to be left behind are older people (particularly over-75s), people living alone, lower-income households, rural communities, people with disabilities, and residents in the North of England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
What Does This Mean For Freeview?
For the 18 million UK homes currently using Freeview, this signals a gradual but inevitable change in how you’ll access free channels.
While the BBC isn’t suggesting we’ll all need to bin our aerials tomorrow, Davie was refreshingly honest about the future:
“Digging in purely on DTT [the technical term for Freeview] is not where the BBC is. The BBC would like to be part of a proactive transition of the UK to fully digitised households.”
In plain English? Freeview as we know it – the service that delivers dozens of channels through your TV aerial – won’t disappear overnight, but its days are numbered as the industry shifts towards internet delivery.
Meanwhile, Freeview faces additional technical challenges. The UK is notably behind other European countries in upgrading its TV broadcasting technology.
While countries like France, Italy, and Spain have moved to more efficient broadcasting standards (DVB-T2), the UK is still largely using older technology from the 1990s (DVB-T and MPEG2).
This technological lag could become particularly problematic after 2031, when TV broadcasters might need to share their broadcast frequencies with mobile phone companies. The older technology uses more broadcast spectrum, which could mean fewer channels would be available if the spectrum needs to be shared.
We’ve Been Here Before
If you’re old enough to remember the digital switchover (when all those analogue TV signals were turned off between 2008 and 2012), you’ll know we’ve navigated big television transitions before.
Dr Shah reminisced about his front-row seat during that previous changeover: “I was on the main board of the BBC when we did the digital switchover. We were conscious, as the board will be now, that we would not leave people behind.”
He added with a hint of nostalgia: “I remember the moment we switched off. There was always a small group of people we could manage, but the direction of travel is clear. People will move to on-demand and IPTV.”
The BBC clearly believes it can use this past experience to ensure that vulnerable viewers aren’t suddenly left staring at blank screens when the next big switch happens.
“Not Our Bill To Pay”
While the BBC is committed to helping viewers navigate the change, they were crystal clear about one thing: they don’t think they should be footing the bill for the infrastructure needed to make it happen.
When asked directly who should pay for ensuring no one gets left behind, Davie couldn’t have been clearer: “I think we should be responsible for making brilliant programming and communicating how our services work.
“I definitely don’t think we should be paying for a switchover in that way. That’s not what the licence fee is paying for.”
In other words, the BBC expects the government to cover the costs of ensuring universal access in the IPTV era – especially for those vulnerable households that might struggle with the transition.
This stance comes as the BBC is already grappling with significant challenges to its funding model. During the same committee session, Dr Shah and Davie faced extensive questioning about TV Licence fee reforms, including potential decriminalisation of non-payment and options for a more progressive payment system based on household income.
The “Nightlight” Option
One solution being considered for Freeview and Freesat is something the TV boffins call a “nightlight” service – keeping a stripped-back version of Freeview running after most channels have moved online, providing just the essentials (like BBC, ITV and news channels) for those who haven’t made the switch.
But even this compromise creates headaches. As Davie admitted: “We have to decide and ensure that we are not running two expensive distribution systems, because that would hobble us.”
Running both internet and traditional broadcasting systems simultaneously would be a massive drain on resources – money that could otherwise go into making shows we actually want to watch.
This matches one of the three potential paths for Freeview’s future that Ofcom outlined earlier this year:
- Upgrading the platform with modernised technology
- Reducing Freeview to a core “nightlight” service
- Establishing a roadmap for completely phasing out traditional aerial TV broadcasting
The Broadband Challenge
A key issue in this transition is not just the availability of broadband but its affordability and usability for all sections of society.
While the government aims to have superfast broadband available to at least 99.65% of homes by 2030, the current average monthly broadband cost in the UK (£26.90) represents a significant barrier for some households.
Around 100,000 households currently cite cost as their main reason for not having internet access, and although discounted “social tariffs” are available for lower-income households, only 220,000 homes currently use these tariffs, despite 4.3 million households being eligible.
What About Freely?
You might also remember Freely – the new service launched in April 2024 that aims to bridge the gap between traditional Freeview and internet-based viewing.
While Freely represents a step towards this hybrid future, its current limitations (only available on 2024 and newer TV sets from certain manufacturers) mean it’s not yet the complete solution to this transition.
The parliamentary session didn’t dive into Freely specifically, but it’s clear that similar hybrid approaches will be crucial in managing this massive shift in how we consume television.
Furthermore, Freely currently has a very limited selection of streaming channels -from the public broadcasters (BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5 and STV), UKTV, and a few others that were recently added.
But all the other, smaller channels that are currently available on Freeview are absent from Freely’s streaming section and still require an aerial.
What This Means For Your TV
For most of us, there’s no need to panic or rush out to buy new equipment just yet. The major changes discussed aren’t expected to begin until after 2030, giving plenty of time for preparation.
If you’re already streaming most of your TV through iPlayer, Netflix, Disney+ and the like, you’re ahead of the curve. But for the millions who still rely primarily on Freeview or Freesat through an aerial or dish, changes will eventually come.
The trickiest part will be ensuring that certain groups don’t get left behind – particularly:
- Older people, especially those over 75
- People living alone
- Lower-income households
- Those in rural communities with patchy broadband
- People with disabilities
For the BBC and Freeview, the challenge is balancing the inevitable shift to internet-based television with their obligation to serve everyone.
As Shah put it: “We need time to reduce the number of people who could be left behind, and then it will be a matter of judgement when we decide that we have done as best we can and then we switch.”
For more news about Freeview, TV and streaming, Subscribe to our free newsletter.
I can see what will happen. The government will announce a tax on people’s monthly internet charge, probably a fixed or minimum amount. This will be handed to the BBC. So EVERYONE will pay – and probably twice – through their home broadband contract and again through their phone contract. Mark my words.
In West Cumbria we were used as guinea pigs for the last digital switchover. Despite that we did not get the vast number of freeview channels the rest of the UK get. This remains the case today. We will also be the last to get decent broadband at least outside the major towns. Communications of any sort here is just not equal in any definition you care to name.
If an updatable internet only freeview box became available tomorrow, with all my freesat stations, I’d be interested. To get rid of the pigeon perch on the roof and associated wiring would be great. (I’m 75, by the way! I have very fast fibre Internet (toob) and a synology Router – and plenty of home automation. I love it!).
Unfortunately, being an older person living on my own, no family, I have no idea what all this means.
If TV manufacturer can make freely available via the app on my older smart TV, I’m all for change, but until this comes available, I’m sticking with my Freeview set via the tv aerial.
It’s nothing to do with the manufacturers – it’s freely deciding whether or not to create an app that can run on smart tv’s or smart dongle’s. So far, freely only want to do deals with tv manufacturers to create new freely telly’s which you’ll be forced to buy. There’s gonna be a fight on their hands with the likes of Google TV, FireTV, PlayStation and Xbox who all want us watching telly through their systems.
More confusion for consumers.
Addionally, the whole experience of using apps and streaming is flaky, despite having a fast net connection, and a fast set top box, the service often freezes.
Because we all pay the Licence Fee, the BBC should be available to all. If the Licence Fee were ditched and the BBC was funded by commercials, for example, then they can do what is best for them.
BBC aside, if we’re all forced into streaming then it will mean that we are all forced into monthly subscriptions. How can anybody guarantee they will always be able to afford it? Times are hard and they are getting harder.
Currently you can pay just the Licence Fee and that’s it. What the BBC seem to want is for us to still pay the Fee but yet also pay for Broadband in order to watch television.
If this is to work then the Licence Fee in it’s current form needs to come to a end and be replaced by a streaming fee which is around the same cost as the current Television Licence. We also need to have reliable Broadband EVERYWHERE where it simply works, just as a aerial or dish does now, buffering will be a thing of the past.
I agree with the BBC about one thing…. they shouldn’t be made to fund it.
What we have now with aerial, satellite and streaming is working. Don’t change it.
The lack of a wider rollout for Freely is still a big concern as its purposefully excluding platforms/devices that wouldn’t have an issue supporting it.
BBC iPLAYER is more widely available than Freely, and it should be the other way around.
The mangled mess that is Freeview now even more so, shows how badly we missed a beat with not enacting the Vaizey plan, which would have made Freeview fit for 2025, not still using ancient tech and encoding methods. There isn’t a single plausible reason why we haven’t taken every Txp to DVB-T2 before today, meaning efficiently delivered services and going to HD-only emission too!
I use DSAT for free-tv mostly because the difference between streaming on ITVX ect, is the quality isn’t the same (50fps ect on Sport) and streaming for my Sport via Now & Discovery+ because its higher quality (4K & 50fps)
Id hope finally at some point, we make streaming on the likes of ITVX match the same tech level as DSAT!
They are insane. Aerial is freedom , streaming is not.
Having read the previous article about the BBC licence fee and now this I feel the bbc is going to struggle to exist in the future. I like the bbc but it’s not good value. I don’t have a 4k tv, I am solely broadband for my viewing. At £14.50 a month for 720p even though my tv is hd and stereo sound is farcical. If a request was made for my house hold income to determine what level I should be paying I would withdraw and stop paying the licence. They are talking about the future when the issues in present urgently need to be addressed.
As freely uses HbbTV OpApp as opposed to DVB-I (according to DVB.org) I am surprised older sets which include this can’t be brought into the fold via an OTA update. Certainly my 2023 LG TV is HbbTV enabled, as was the set before that. I realise this could cause some issues with testing older hardware etc. But surely it’s not beyond the pale. It could also account for why some OEMs like LG have not released a dedicated Freely model yet, could they be testing an OTA to install the software for Freely on existing models? Certainly the like of LG and Samsung sell more on panel quality over which broadcasts the TVs can access. The OTA approach would certainly reduce the need for folks to buy a new TV, especially when at the upper end of the market you it can be spendy.