The BBC TV Licence fee saga continues – with a fresh £5 increase announced for 2025, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
In a somewhat surprising move, the government has scrapped its expert panel exploring alternative funding models for the BBC, just as viewer evasion rates hit their highest point in nearly 30 years.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy revealed this week that while the licence fee will rise to £174.50 next April, her department is changing course on how to tackle the BBC’s future.
Gone are the industry experts who were supposed to figure it all out – instead, the government wants to hear directly from the British public.
Breaking Down the Licence Fee Changes
The upcoming increase follows this year’s substantial jump from £159 to £169.50, which came after a two-year freeze that had put significant financial pressure on the BBC.
The government says future increases until 2027 will be tied to the annual CPI inflation rate, which currently stands at 2.96%.
This more modest rise of £5 for 2025 (compared to 2024’s £10.50 increase) aims to provide the BBC with stable funding while being mindful of household budgets during the cost-of-living crisis.
It’s worth remembering that the TV Licence fee isn’t just for watching BBC channels – it’s required for watching or recording any live TV broadcasts from any channel, including international ones, and for using BBC iPlayer.
This broad application has become increasingly controversial in an era dominated by streaming services.
It’s also worth noting that TV Licence fee evasion remains a criminal offence, potentially resulting in a fine of up to £1,000 or, in rare cases, jail time if fines go unpaid.
However, the BBC emphasizes that prosecution is always a last resort – in 2022, only about 0.18% of the population was prosecuted for licence fee evasion, accounting for less than 2% of all evaders.
The TV Licence Evasion Crisis
The announcement comes at a critical time for the BBC, with licence fee evasion reaching its highest level since 1995.
Recent figures show an alarming 11.30% evasion rate, up from 10.58% in the previous year, representing approximately £466 million in lost income.
But there’s an important distinction to make here: “evasion” means households that should be paying for a TV Licence but aren’t, while separately, there’s a growing number of households legally declaring they don’t need one because they don’t watch live TV or use BBC iPlayer.
This second group has grown dramatically – the number of households declaring they don’t need a licence has surged by half a million in just one year, reaching 3.3 million.
To put that in perspective, these opt-outs could potentially translate to an additional £524 million in lost revenue for the BBC, on top of the losses from evasion.
The rising evasion rates appear to be driven by several factors:
- The increasing shift towards streaming services like Netflix and Disney+
- Economic pressures on households during the cost-of-living crisis
- Changing viewing habits, especially among younger audiences
- Growing resistance to paying for a service some feel they rarely use
The BBC’s own analysis suggests the primary cause is a reduction in customers’ consumption of BBC and other licensable content.
This is backed by recent viewing figures showing that while around 85% of UK adults still engage with BBC services weekly, the average time spent with BBC content has dropped to 15 hours and 32 minutes per week, down from 16 hours and 41 minutes last year.
Expert Panel: A Short-Lived Experiment
In March 2024, the previous government assembled a nine-person expert panel to explore the BBC’s future funding options.
The panel included industry heavyweights like former ITV chairman Sir Peter Bazalgette and ex-Channel 5 chief David Elstein, tasked with finding sustainable alternatives to the licence fee.
Now, just eight months later, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has announced the panel’s disbandment.
Instead of a separate review, these crucial funding discussions will be incorporated into the broader Charter Review process, which will include a public consultation and what Nandy calls “an honest national conversation” about the broadcaster’s future.
Support for Struggling Households
Recognising the financial pressures many households face, the government is expanding the Simple Payment Plan (SPP).
This scheme, which allows people to spread the cost of their licence fee across the year, will now be available to an estimated additional 9,000 unlicensed households per month who are experiencing financial difficulties.
TV Licensing agents will be able to offer the scheme more proactively to vulnerable households, with the government expecting around 500,000 households to benefit from the plan by 2027.
This expansion builds on previous efforts to make the licence fee more manageable, including the BBC’s action plan announced last year to address the disproportionate impact of fee enforcement on women.
The BBC’s Financial Challenges
The decisions come amid what the BBC describes as a real-terms annual reduction in income of 30%, amounting to over £1 billion.
This financial squeeze results from various factors, including:
- The previous two-year licence fee freeze
- Rising operational costs during high inflation
- Increased competition from streaming services
- Changes in government policy, such as the BBC having to fund the World Service
- The growing number of households opting out of the licence fee
In response to the government’s decision, a BBC spokesperson said:
“We welcome confirmation that the licence fee will increase in line with inflation next year. We also look forward to the debate about the future and working with the Government to ensure sustainable, long-term public funding.
“As part of these discussions we will run our biggest ever public engagement exercise in 2025 so that audiences are at the heart of shaping our future.”
Looking Ahead: The Charter Review
The current BBC Charter runs until December 2027, and the government has committed to maintaining the licence fee system until then. However, the upcoming Charter Review will be a big step in determining the broadcaster’s long-term future.
“In the short term, we are providing the BBC with funding certainty, while supporting thousands more households facing financial hardship to spread the cost of a TV licence,” Nandy explains, highlighting the government’s twin approach of ensuring stability while planning for change.
This review comes at a pivotal time, just weeks after BBC Chairman Samir Shah’s speech where he rejected both advertising and subscription models for the BBC’s future.
Shah instead proposed radical changes, including making the BBC’s Royal Charter permanent (similar to the Bank of England’s) and ensuring better prominence for BBC content on streaming platforms.
The Charter Review will need to address several key challenges:
- Finding a sustainable funding model that preserves the BBC’s independence
- Adapting to changing viewing habits and technology
- Ensuring British content remains prominent in an increasingly global market
- Maintaining universal access while securing adequate funding
- Addressing the high evasion rates and growing opt-outs
For more news about TV in the UK, Subscribe to our free newsletter.
Apart from all the the reasons given above about quality etc, amazingly i see no mention of the sheer number of people who are sick of the bbc and its blatant left wing bias and the pushing of its woke ideology down our throats.
Why do we pay a tax to watch other channels ?…I dont pay Sainsburys to keep Tescos in business…
If subscription is already being ruled out that shows the kind of people we are dealing with…
I think a majority of people have switched off. Yes, there are a few that still believe its value for money with a few that are mostly retired and grown-up with live television and theres always going to be a few that will ruin this for everyone else by watch BBC content without a licence (the evasion). I personally have never watched live television, because society has changed so much. We’re working longer hours and so when we get in from work, we stream most of the content. Traditional family values such as gathering around the tv are long gone. We can access content sooner, rather than wait for it to be scheduled (this always applies when it comes to Xmas TV viewing). So yes, I’m surprised that the BBC has lasted this long to be honest, but with those minority of people who keep paying their licences, I guess the BBC have to continue to provide some sort of service, whilst chasing those who abuse it.
You are missing the point that Live television has not gone away.
Just walk into any pub on any football event and you will see that noone depends on their iPlayer for streaming sports events.
Yes, but even that in some cases is a paid event or a paid subscription. So having a TV licence and being expected to pay for a live event can work out quite expensive.
Make the BBC a subscription service and see if it survives with the rubbish and many repeats it shows.
This says it all, “In BBC Chairman Samir Shah’s speech he rejected both advertising and subscription models for the BBC’s future, of course he did, as subscription would spell the end of this dinosaur for good and he knows it and why use advertising when they can keep on ripping the public off which generates far more income than advertising.
What is the justification for charging for a licence to watch other channel`s far superior live content while paying disgusting amounts of salaries to non-entity presenters (Lineker) and deviants (Edwards)
I think theres a minority of people who do feel its good value for money, whilst there are pensioners who have grown up with scheduled tv all their lives, that the BBC have to justify to these people to keep going, whilst at the same time, trying to chase people who dont pay for a TV licence.
Because of $ky there no longer a sustainable amount of advertising revenue . Had the BBC went commercial back in the 70s or early 80s advertising would have worked then.
So long as the proposed “national conversation” about the BBC’s future is truly national, unbiased, and not cherry-picked to a section of TV viewers who are pro-license fee. What I am glad to see emerging in these articles is a distinction between “evasion”, which implies that people should be paying for a license but are not, and non-payment due to a license legally not being required. Given that there is no legal requirement to inform the BBC if you no longer need a license, I wonder if the number of households without license is being skewed to look like a higher number of “evasions”.
It’s a heavy tax the bbc licence and it needs to be scraped we need to be like a lot of countries abolish it at this rate by 2030 the tv licence will be about £200 a year and the is daylight robbery for the crap you get on the bbc channels
I completely agree with your view,the amount of repeats that get shown are astronomical compared to ITV and other such free view services.
The last time I watched the BBC was maybe 4+ years as there is nothing of interest on there anymore even the news you can get for free
No BBC salary should be higher than an MPs, current salaries are far OTT.
If Lisa Nandy thinks so highly of the BBC, then surely subscription is the way forward along with the dozen or so others, who offer subscription, or is that a no no for this outdated dinosaur?
Bring in adds to fund it if I could I wouldn’t pay the TV licence compleat ripoff
It’s interesting to read there is no mention of reducing the breadth of the BBC’s activities to it’s lower cost. If, as we are constantly being told many of their services are so popular revising them to a commercial format should be considered; radio 1,2 & 3 have commercial alternatives. As most televisions support a broadband connection, and broadcasters all require the viewer to create an account & password to log in to their platform, I advocate all content should be accessed by micro-payments. Pay for what you view, the underlying cost could be financed by central government which would give financial certainty to the BBC and also avoid license fee evasion. TV has evolved, requiring an innovative rethink to how it is paid for.
Why does the BBC have such an aversion to an advertising funded model? It works perfectly well, for example, in Canada with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
Because of $ky there no longer a sustainable amount of advertising revenue . Had the BBC went commercial back in the 70s or early 80s advertising would have worked then.
Because 1. Its easy money for the BBC and 2. Everyone knows that the quality of its services is so poor (even the BBC knows this), which is why a majority of people are switching off, but in the dream world of the BBC, they honestly believe that everyone is watching BBC content, but are evading and not paying for a TV Licence.