TV Licence Fee Doomed? New Panel To Review BBC’s Future

This post may contain affiliate links*

In a move that could signal the end of the traditional TV Licence fee as we know it, the UK government has announced the formation of an expert panel tasked with advising on the BBC’s future funding.

Today’s announcement arrives as the broadcaster faces the challenges of a rapidly changing media landscape (with streaming services taking the lead), and increasing scrutiny over the licence fee’s relevance.

With the fee set to rise to £169.50 next month, the debate around its sustainability and fairness is intensifying.

The panel, comprising nine industry experts from diverse backgrounds, including former chiefs of ITV and Channel 5, is set to explore viable alternatives to the current funding model.

Their expertise will be important in assessing whether a subscription model, advertising, or other funding mechanisms could offer a more sustainable solution for the BBC, aligning with modern viewing habits and reducing the financial burden on households.

The Licence Fee Controversy

The TV Licence fee, first introduced in 1946 (it was £2 back then), is a mandatory payment for all UK households who watch the BBC live, recorded, or on BBC iPlayer – and it is used to fund the BBC.

Furthermore, if you watch any live TV from any broadcaster (even an international one) – you also need to pay the fee (See our full guide on whether you need to pay the TV Licence fee or not).

Failure to pay the TV licence fee is a criminal offence and can lead to a fine of £1,000 – and even, in rare cases, jail time – if you fail to pay the fee and the fine in court.

TV Licence fee inforgraphic 2024

Currently set at £159 (following a two-year freeze), the TV Licence Fee will increase to £169.50/year in April 2024.

The fee is currently essential for the BBC to deliver a wide range of TV, radio, and online services.

However, the licence fee has increasingly come under fire, with critics arguing that it is outdated in an era dominated by on-demand streaming services like Netflix and Disney+.

The rise in licence fee evasion rates, reaching their highest point since 1995, underscores the growing public resistance to the fee.

The government also says that broadcast TV reach and viewing fell significantly in 2022, with weekly reach falling from 83% in 2021 to 79% in 2022, the largest annual drop ever. 

With the broadcasting sector undergoing rapid change and public viewing habits shifting dramatically, the BBC’s funding mechanism needs to be reassessed urgently.

debt collector bailiff tv licence fee 1200

The enforcement of the licence fee through criminal sanctions has also been deemed disproportionate, prompting discussions on decriminalisation and alternative funding models.

The BBC’s Future: Government Assembles Expert Team

This week, the UK government has initiated a comprehensive review of the broadcaster’s funding model.

At the heart of this review is a newly appointed expert panel, tasked with advising on long-term funding solutions for the BBC, that align with the evolving media landscape and public expectations.

Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer’s selection of this panel marks a major step towards evaluating the BBC’s current licence fee model and exploring viable alternatives for future funding.

Lucy Frazer Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
Lucy Frazer, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

The Composition of the Expert Panel

The government has handpicked nine industry experts to form a panel that will delve into the BBC’s current funding mechanism and consider future alternatives.

This panel includes seasoned professionals from various sectors of the media industry, each with a unique perspective:

Martin Ivens, current Editor of the Times Literary Supplement and former Editor of the Sunday Times newspaper. 

Sir Peter Bazalgette, former Chairman of ITV and current Co-Chair of the Creative Industries Council. 

Siobhan Kenny MBE, former CEO of Radiocentre and Director of Communications at DCMS, now CEO of her own consultancy. 

Dame Frances Cairncross DBE is a respected economic commentator and former Management Editor of the Economist. She led the independent Cairncross Review, which explored sustainable journalism in the UK.

David Elstein, with a rich background in broadcasting, including serving as Channel 5’s first Chief Executive.

Oli Hyatt, co-founder and former Managing Director of Blue Zoo Productions, known for creating TV content for young audiences. 

Helen Bower Easton CBE, former Director of Communications for FCDO and current Director of Communications for the Financial Conduct Authority. Easton’s expertise in foreign policy and the BBC World Service will be particularly relevant.

Amber de Botton, with experience at Sky News and ITV, and former Downing Street’s Director of Communications. 

Lorna Tilbian, Executive Chairman of Dowgate Capital and former Executive PLC Director at Numis Corporation PLC. 

Objectives and Scope of the Panel

The expert panel’s primary objective is to assess the viability of the BBC’s licence fee model in today’s digital age, where streaming services and on-demand content have transformed viewing habits.

TV licence documents

The panel will explore a range of funding alternatives, from subscription models like Netflix to advertising and increased commercial activities, aiming to recommend options that ensure the BBC’s financial stability and independence.

Moreover, the panel will investigate ways for the BBC to enhance its commercial revenue, potentially reducing its reliance on public funding.

This includes evaluating the broadcaster’s ability to adapt to a new funding model without compromising its mandate to provide universal, high-quality content.

Exploring TV Licence Fee Alternatives

The government has already mentioned several alternatives being considered in the past, which will now be examined by the expert panel.

Among the options are a subscription model, a broadband levy, increased commercial activity, and adding adverts.

Each option presents its own set of challenges and opportunities, with the subscription model, in particular, drawing significant attention.

Woman with bills

Previous discussions around a BBC-based subscription have yielded mixed reactions.

While a subscription model could potentially align the BBC with modern streaming services, concerns have been raised about its impact on the broadcaster’s ability to serve all segments of the population.

The BBC’s own analysis suggested that a theoretical subscription service could cost significantly more than the current licence fee – up to £400/Year – raising questions about affordability and value for money.

Looking Ahead At The BBC’s Future

The expert panel’s findings will play an important role in shaping the future of the BBC’s funding.

The government is committed to maintaining the licence fee until the end of the current Charter period in December 2027.

However, the public will also have a say in the matter, as the government has promised to consult the public as part of the Charter Review process – though a public consultation will not be a part of the newly formed expert panel.

As the panel embarks on its mission, the stakes are high for the BBC, its viewers, and the broader UK media landscape.

The outcome of this review could redefine public service broadcasting in the country, and, of course – the future of the TV licence fee.

For more news and updates about TV, Subscribe to our free newsletter.

11 thoughts on “TV Licence Fee Doomed? New Panel To Review BBC’s Future”

  1. This review should start from the premin that no licence is required to watch any other live programs or own a TV set.
    Apart from paying insignificant presenters bloated saleries the BBC has grown like Topsy with fingers in too many pies, the list is enormous if you investigate.
    Anyone as old as me will remember the birth of TV at that time the BBC delivered radio and tv programs and produced the good old Radio Times, just compare that with today.
    I laugh at the subscription proposal as I think BBC would be rocked at how few take it up.
    In any case it needs to be free for government emergency use as we are living in difficult times.

    • Whether its presenters on bloated salaries or not, or the BBC determined to make a huge profit, the service provided is not worth the fee alone. It seems to me that they are combining radio with tv in order to save money. I understand that you’re not happy with the review presented, but that is what makes us soo typically British, that more and more people would rather moan about it and pay the license fee, just so they are not breaking any law, whilst in other countries they would protest against this, thus it means breaking the law, until it gets overturned. The law can be wrong at times and its up to us to stand-up against it and be counted. But as far as the BBC is concerned, if you’re one of those individuals who pays for their license and just moans about it and everyone else does the same, then you cant blame the BBC for trying.

  2. Well there you have it. The government has all decided on THEIR panel of experts and probably not one of them in touch with the real world. So we know exactly how all this is going to end. Why cant they hold this procession in a court of human rights with real people, participating in a jury service? After all, hardly anyone agrees with the cost of the licence fee and yet, its people like us, who have to attend court to prove our innocence with the horrifying thought, of serving jail time. What the BBC is doing is criminal, greed and corruption at the tax-payer’s expense and they should be held accountable.

  3. This so-called panel of experts should have members of the public on it. One might then get a more balanced view on what the public actually want from a broadcaster.

    Personally, I would slim down the BBC drastically. Hive off the radio programming. Cut some of the TV channels that nobody watches, it’s too bloated. Get rid of some of their media stars such as Gary Lineker who are paid too much for their output. Start advertising during programs commercially. The BBC is always boasting it is an advert free station which is not true. They cram masses of advertising their own program, why not do it for paid advertising. I think they also slim down the news service and present the news honestly. Get rid of the left wing bias that has crept in during the last few years of fake news.

    I think lumping an extra fee onto broadband contracts is a non-starter. This is just shifting an unfair tax onto everybody who has broadband. The public would see through this straightaway.

    • The BBC has already converted radio station to tv – look at Nicky Campbell for example. Switch the tv off and switch on the radio and hes there. Theres no getting away from him. 😄

  4. If you want to watch the BBC then you should be able to pay to subscribe to it, just like Netflix, Prime, Sky etc etc, if you don’t want it you don’t pay to subscribe, just like Netflix, Prime, Sky etc etc……………..there, sorted without any ‘expert’ input !!

  5. The BBC is bloated, it has 8 TV channels and that’s not including the regional versions, don’t get me started on the number of radio stations. The BBC need to become leaner in the 21st century, the old saying less is more.
    I got rid of my TV licence a few years ago because I do not agree with having to pay for something I do not use. I used to watch a bit of BBC News and maybe Doctor Who, I started to find the News Output biased.
    I think a panel reviewing the future funding of the BBC is a great idea, its just a shame that the said panel is made up of people who clearly don’t understand the general populations problem with the licence fee.

  6. A panel of experts, and, it appears, no members of Joe Public.
    The BBC cannot survive as is on subscriptions, so it either needs government subsidy, or significant reduction in services. That final one will be catastrophic, IMHO. It’s not all about TV; Radio and News would suffer significantly.
    Something will change, but it will require subsidy.
    BTW, I do watch BBC TV, and listen to some BBC radio, but, I’ve become disillusioned with some of the content quality which seems to heading to a lower level to compete with other channels. I’m watching the BBC less, and streaming less of its content.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

man watchin streaming tv on tablet

Get Cord Buster's Free UK TV Streaming Cheatsheet


Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get TV And Tech News

Get Bonus Streaming TV Guide